THIS SPACE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION

Used documentation

General information

In the figure below, we present a logical view about the relationship between the three basic services of the ehealth platform that are the WS Consent, the Therapeutic link WS, and the Therapeutic exclusion services. A consent can be managed by different types of end-users:

  • Health Care (HC) parties: a physician, a pharmacy (it is noteworthy that there is no difference between pharmacy and a pharmacist), Hospital, Dentist, Nurse, Midwife, Health Insurance Organization (HIO), Authorized organization in behalf of a HIO, Group of nurses
  • Citizen: a patient, a parent of a patient, a mandatary  

A consent may have two types. Indeed, it is called prospective when it is valuable for data posterior to the signing date (i.e. the date that should be taken into account is the ‘medical date’ of the transaction). It is referred to as retrospective in the opposite case.

The Consent service provides four methods (it is noteworthy that in this use case only the GetPatientConsent method is used):

  • The "PutPatientConsent" method allows an end-user to declare the patient consent (i.e. make a consent active)
  • The "RevokePatientConsent" method enables an end-user to revoke the patient consent (i.e. make a consent inactive)
  • The "GetPatientConsent" method allows an end-user to consult information about a consent and to check whether its status (i.e. active or inactive)
  • The "GetPatientConsentStatus" method is similar as the "GetPatientConsent" method with the status of the consent returned in the response message.


Basic flow

FlowSpecification









Use case ID

ATH-UC-12-BF

Use case name

Consult the consent of a patient using the GetPatientConsent method

Actors

  • Citizen

  • HC party

Short Description

In order to consult the consent of a patient using the SOA-based version, it is important to use the Token exchange service in order to convert a JWT token into a SAML one (and vice versa). The aim of this use case is to check a consent status after its activation or revoke.

Priority

1 (High)

Must have: The system must implement this goal/ assumption to be accepted.

Pre-Conditions

  • The user is already logged in via the Token exchange service
  • Information about the request (request identifier, end-user identifier, date and time of the request)
  • SSIN of the concerned patient 
  • Type of the consent (optional)

Post-Conditions

  • Information about the response (response identifier, end-user identifier, data and time of the response, initial request)

  • An acknowledgement (status of the completion, errors if exist)
  • Information about the consent (SSIN of the patient, consent type, data of declaration, author of the declaration)

Steps (basic flow)

1

The user tries to consult the consent and the client sends a getPatientConsent request to the IAM connect

2The IAM connect routes the request to the WS consent

3

The WS consent finds information about the consent of a patient 

4The WS consent sends a response to the IAM  

5

The IAM connect receives the response and sends it to the client

6The client receives information about the consent of the patient

Exceptions (exception flows)

  • Invalid or incorrect data:
    • Invalid transaction identifier.
    • Invalid request sender.
    • Invalid healthcare party identifier.
    • Invalid patient identifier (invalid SSIN, eID, SIS numbers).
    • Invalid consent type.

Frequency

  • Every time the user wants to consult the consent of a given patient
  • No labels

1 Comment

  1. Unknown User (fabian.steels@cetic.be)

    I think that normally this use case doesn't have to be used because it’s based on a SOAP technology.


    cf Architecture: Mock App